Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Section 430 bars civil court jurisdiction where the relief sought falls within matters the Tribunal is empowered to decide. Reading the oppression and mismanagement provisions together, the court held that the NCLT can regulate company affairs on an interim basis and grant incidental equitable relief, including injunctions, when the complained-of acts concern company accounts, records or evidence. Allegations framed as unauthorised access, alteration of records or tampering did not take the dispute outside the Tribunal's remit because they were integral to the oppression and mismanagement controversy. The civil suit sought no independent relief beyond that dispute, so the civil court lacked jurisdiction and the trial court's refusal of interim relief was restored.
Section 430 bars civil court jurisdiction where the relief sought falls within matters the Tribunal is empowered to decide. Reading the oppression and mismanagement provisions together, the court held that the NCLT can regulate company affairs on an interim basis and grant incidental equitable relief, including injunctions, when the complained-of acts concern company accounts, records or evidence. Allegations framed as unauthorised access, alteration of records or tampering did not take the dispute outside the Tribunal's remit because they were integral to the oppression and mismanagement controversy. The civil suit sought no independent relief beyond that dispute, so the civil court lacked jurisdiction and the trial court's refusal of interim relief was restored.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.