Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Statutory notice to the drawer in cheque dishonour matters is mandatory, and service on a third person does not satisfy the notice requirement discussed here. The text also states that the complainant must lay a factual foundation for the presumption of a legally enforceable debt by showing financial capacity and source of funds for the alleged loan. Where the complainant admitted no bank record, income-tax return, or other proof of funds, the presumption under the negotiable instruments law was treated as unrebutted only if that foundational proof existed; on the described facts, the defects in notice and proof of capacity were treated as fatal to the conviction under cheque dishonour law.
Statutory notice to the drawer in cheque dishonour matters is mandatory, and service on a third person does not satisfy the notice requirement discussed here. The text also states that the complainant must lay a factual foundation for the presumption of a legally enforceable debt by showing financial capacity and source of funds for the alleged loan. Where the complainant admitted no bank record, income-tax return, or other proof of funds, the presumption under the negotiable instruments law was treated as unrebutted only if that foundational proof existed; on the described facts, the defects in notice and proof of capacity were treated as fatal to the conviction under cheque dishonour law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.