<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cheque dishonour claims require valid drawer notice and proof of loan capacity before presumptions can sustain conviction</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101044</link>
    <description>Statutory notice to the drawer in cheque dishonour matters is mandatory, and service on a third person does not satisfy the notice requirement discussed here. The text also states that the complainant must lay a factual foundation for the presumption of a legally enforceable debt by showing financial capacity and source of funds for the alleged loan. Where the complainant admitted no bank record, income-tax return, or other proof of funds, the presumption under the negotiable instruments law was treated as unrebutted only if that foundational proof existed; on the described facts, the defects in notice and proof of capacity were treated as fatal to the conviction under cheque dishonour law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 07:08:06 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 07:08:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=908335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cheque dishonour claims require valid drawer notice and proof of loan capacity before presumptions can sustain conviction</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101044</link>
      <description>Statutory notice to the drawer in cheque dishonour matters is mandatory, and service on a third person does not satisfy the notice requirement discussed here. The text also states that the complainant must lay a factual foundation for the presumption of a legally enforceable debt by showing financial capacity and source of funds for the alleged loan. Where the complainant admitted no bank record, income-tax return, or other proof of funds, the presumption under the negotiable instruments law was treated as unrebutted only if that foundational proof existed; on the described facts, the defects in notice and proof of capacity were treated as fatal to the conviction under cheque dishonour law.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 07:08:06 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>