Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Statutory notice to the drawer in cheque dishonour matters is mandatory, and service on a third person does not satisfy the notice requirement discussed here. The text also states that the complainant must lay a factual foundation for the presumption of a legally enforceable debt by showing financial capacity and source of funds for the alleged loan. Where the complainant admitted no bank record, income-tax return, or other proof of funds, the presumption under the negotiable instruments law was treated as unrebutted only if that foundational proof existed; on the described facts, the defects in notice and proof of capacity were treated as fatal to the conviction under cheque dishonour law.
Statutory notice to the drawer in cheque dishonour matters is mandatory, and service on a third person does not satisfy the notice requirement discussed here. The text also states that the complainant must lay a factual foundation for the presumption of a legally enforceable debt by showing financial capacity and source of funds for the alleged loan. Where the complainant admitted no bank record, income-tax return, or other proof of funds, the presumption under the negotiable instruments law was treated as unrebutted only if that foundational proof existed; on the described facts, the defects in notice and proof of capacity were treated as fatal to the conviction under cheque dishonour law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.