Timing mismatch in income recognition requires verification whether receipts were already taxed in an earlier year; matter remitted for fresh examinat...
FOB transaction value and export incentives: customs valuation cannot override contractual export benefits or support confiscation without valid proof...
Consistency in the assessee's own case governed the treatment of alleged notional interest on advances to a subsidiary: the addition was deleted because the issue had already been decided in the assessee's favour on identical facts, and the Revenue showed no distinguishing fact or change in law for the year. Pendency of earlier Revenue appeals before the High Court did not, by itself, justify departure from the settled view. The note records that the notional interest addition was therefore upheld as deleted for the relevant year.
Consistency in the assessee's own case governed the treatment of alleged notional interest on advances to a subsidiary: the addition was deleted because the issue had already been decided in the assessee's favour on identical facts, and the Revenue showed no distinguishing fact or change in law for the year. Pendency of earlier Revenue appeals before the High Court did not, by itself, justify departure from the settled view. The note records that the notional interest addition was therefore upheld as deleted for the relevant year.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
