https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100995 Consistency in the assessee's own case governed the treatment of alleged notional interest on advances to a subsidiary: the addition was deleted because the issue had already been decided in the assessee's favour on identical facts, and the Revenue showed no distinguishing fact or change in law for the year. Pendency of earlier Revenue appeals before the High Court did not, by itself, justify departure from the settled view. The note records that the notional interest addition was therefore upheld as deleted for the relevant year. en-us Mon, 22 Jun 2026 08:39:17 +0530 Mon, 22 Jun 2026 08:39:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100995 Consistency in the assessee's own case governed the treatment of alleged notional interest on advances to a subsidiary: the addition was deleted because the issue had already been decided in the assessee's favour on identical facts, and the Revenue showed no distinguishing fact or change in law for the year. Pendency of earlier Revenue appeals before the High Court did not, by itself, justify departure from the settled view. The note records that the notional interest addition was therefore upheld as deleted for the relevant year. Highlights Income Tax Mon, 22 Jun 2026 08:39:17 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100995