Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
241 to 260 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Consistency in the assessee's own case governed the treatment of alleged notional interest on advances to a subsidiary: the addition was deleted because the issue had already been decided in the assessee's favour on identical facts, and the Revenue showed no distinguishing fact or change in law for the year. Pendency of earlier Revenue appeals before the High Court did not, by itself, justify departure from the settled view. The note records that the notional interest addition was therefore upheld as deleted for the relevant year.
Consistency in the assessee's own case governed the treatment of alleged notional interest on advances to a subsidiary: the addition was deleted because the issue had already been decided in the assessee's favour on identical facts, and the Revenue showed no distinguishing fact or change in law for the year. Pendency of earlier Revenue appeals before the High Court did not, by itself, justify departure from the settled view. The note records that the notional interest addition was therefore upheld as deleted for the relevant year.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.