Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Consistency in the assessee's own case governed the treatment of alleged notional interest on advances to a subsidiary: the addition was deleted because the issue had already been decided in the assessee's favour on identical facts, and the Revenue showed no distinguishing fact or change in law for the year. Pendency of earlier Revenue appeals before the High Court did not, by itself, justify departure from the settled view. The note records that the notional interest addition was therefore upheld as deleted for the relevant year.
Consistency in the assessee's own case governed the treatment of alleged notional interest on advances to a subsidiary: the addition was deleted because the issue had already been decided in the assessee's favour on identical facts, and the Revenue showed no distinguishing fact or change in law for the year. Pendency of earlier Revenue appeals before the High Court did not, by itself, justify departure from the settled view. The note records that the notional interest addition was therefore upheld as deleted for the relevant year.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
