Revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 upheld; faceless assessments subject to revision when AO fails requisite enquiries, remitted for fresh asse...
Limited scope of processing under section 143(1): enhancement without show cause is unsustainable; remand for residency, taxation and TDS verification...
Contractual reimbursement of the incremental GST burden could operate only between contractors and their employers, because statutory GST liability, return filing, and the incidents of interest, penalty, and limitation must be governed strictly by the GST enactments. The HC held that a writ court could not direct tax authorities to permit filing or amendment of returns after 01.07.2017 contrary to the statute, or waive statutory consequences. The impugned directions to the tax authorities were set aside, and the reimbursement direction was confined to the concerned employers, leaving the contractual dispute intact but outside the GST administration.
Contractual reimbursement of the incremental GST burden could operate only between contractors and their employers, because statutory GST liability, return filing, and the incidents of interest, penalty, and limitation must be governed strictly by the GST enactments. The HC held that a writ court could not direct tax authorities to permit filing or amendment of returns after 01.07.2017 contrary to the statute, or waive statutory consequences. The impugned directions to the tax authorities were set aside, and the reimbursement direction was confined to the concerned employers, leaving the contractual dispute intact but outside the GST administration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
