Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether directions permitting filing of revised returns and waiving interest, penalty and limitation under the GST regime, and restraining the tax authorities from precipitative action, were sustainable.
Analysis: The liability to pay GST, and the consequences of assessment, recovery and enforcement, are governed strictly by the statutory scheme. Contractual arrangements between the contractors and the employers could not alter the operation of the GST laws or justify directions contrary to the statute. Interest under Section 50 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was treated as mandatory, and there was no authority to permit revised returns or to waive statutory interest, penalty or limitation in the manner directed by the writ court. The dispute as to reimbursement of incremental tax burden was characterized as a matter between the contractors and their employers, not a basis for issuing directions to the tax authorities.
Conclusion: The directions issued to the tax authorities permitting revised returns, waiving statutory consequences and restraining enforcement were unsustainable and were set aside. The appeal succeeded to that extent.