Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Contractual reimbursement of the incremental GST burden could operate only between contractors and their employers, because statutory GST liability, return filing, and the incidents of interest, penalty, and limitation must be governed strictly by the GST enactments. The HC held that a writ court could not direct tax authorities to permit filing or amendment of returns after 01.07.2017 contrary to the statute, or waive statutory consequences. The impugned directions to the tax authorities were set aside, and the reimbursement direction was confined to the concerned employers, leaving the contractual dispute intact but outside the GST administration.
Contractual reimbursement of the incremental GST burden could operate only between contractors and their employers, because statutory GST liability, return filing, and the incidents of interest, penalty, and limitation must be governed strictly by the GST enactments. The HC held that a writ court could not direct tax authorities to permit filing or amendment of returns after 01.07.2017 contrary to the statute, or waive statutory consequences. The impugned directions to the tax authorities were set aside, and the reimbursement direction was confined to the concerned employers, leaving the contractual dispute intact but outside the GST administration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.