Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Contractual reimbursement of the incremental GST burden could operate only between contractors and their employers, because statutory GST liability, return filing, and the incidents of interest, penalty, and limitation must be governed strictly by the GST enactments. The HC held that a writ court could not direct tax authorities to permit filing or amendment of returns after 01.07.2017 contrary to the statute, or waive statutory consequences. The impugned directions to the tax authorities were set aside, and the reimbursement direction was confined to the concerned employers, leaving the contractual dispute intact but outside the GST administration.
Contractual reimbursement of the incremental GST burden could operate only between contractors and their employers, because statutory GST liability, return filing, and the incidents of interest, penalty, and limitation must be governed strictly by the GST enactments. The HC held that a writ court could not direct tax authorities to permit filing or amendment of returns after 01.07.2017 contrary to the statute, or waive statutory consequences. The impugned directions to the tax authorities were set aside, and the reimbursement direction was confined to the concerned employers, leaving the contractual dispute intact but outside the GST administration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.