Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Reinsurance premium remitted to non-resident reinsurers was not shown to be taxable in India either through a permanent establishment in India or as fees for technical services or royalty, so no tax was required to be withheld at source. The Tribunal noted that the Indian subsidiary was not the foreign reinsurer's PE for the relevant payments, and there was no material showing that technical, consultancy or similar services were rendered. The demand under section 201(1) and interest under section 201(1A) were therefore deleted, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Reinsurance premium remitted to non-resident reinsurers was not shown to be taxable in India either through a permanent establishment in India or as fees for technical services or royalty, so no tax was required to be withheld at source. The Tribunal noted that the Indian subsidiary was not the foreign reinsurer's PE for the relevant payments, and there was no material showing that technical, consultancy or similar services were rendered. The demand under section 201(1) and interest under section 201(1A) were therefore deleted, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
