Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Reinsurance premium remitted to non-resident reinsurers was not shown to be taxable in India either through a permanent establishment in India or as fees for technical services or royalty, so no tax was required to be withheld at source. The Tribunal noted that the Indian subsidiary was not the foreign reinsurer's PE for the relevant payments, and there was no material showing that technical, consultancy or similar services were rendered. The demand under section 201(1) and interest under section 201(1A) were therefore deleted, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Reinsurance premium remitted to non-resident reinsurers was not shown to be taxable in India either through a permanent establishment in India or as fees for technical services or royalty, so no tax was required to be withheld at source. The Tribunal noted that the Indian subsidiary was not the foreign reinsurer's PE for the relevant payments, and there was no material showing that technical, consultancy or similar services were rendered. The demand under section 201(1) and interest under section 201(1A) were therefore deleted, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.