Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3061 to 3080 of 96136 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reinsurance premium remitted to non-resident reinsurers was not shown to be taxable in India either through a permanent establishment in India or as fees for technical services or royalty, so no tax was required to be withheld at source. The Tribunal noted that the Indian subsidiary was not the foreign reinsurer's PE for the relevant payments, and there was no material showing that technical, consultancy or similar services were rendered. The demand under section 201(1) and interest under section 201(1A) were therefore deleted, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Reinsurance premium remitted to non-resident reinsurers was not shown to be taxable in India either through a permanent establishment in India or as fees for technical services or royalty, so no tax was required to be withheld at source. The Tribunal noted that the Indian subsidiary was not the foreign reinsurer's PE for the relevant payments, and there was no material showing that technical, consultancy or similar services were rendered. The demand under section 201(1) and interest under section 201(1A) were therefore deleted, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.