Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
561 to 580 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Where an immovable property purchase was supported by an earlier agreement, earlier possession and cheque payments made before registration, the relevant consideration was treated as that prior arrangement rather than the later registered deed. On that basis, adopting the stamp duty value as on the registration date for an addition under section 56(2)(x)(b)(B) was unjustified because the record showed the transaction had been agreed and partly performed earlier. The addition was deleted.
Where an immovable property purchase was supported by an earlier agreement, earlier possession and cheque payments made before registration, the relevant consideration was treated as that prior arrangement rather than the later registered deed. On that basis, adopting the stamp duty value as on the registration date for an addition under section 56(2)(x)(b)(B) was unjustified because the record showed the transaction had been agreed and partly performed earlier. The addition was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.