Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether addition under section 56(2)(x)(b)(B) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be made by adopting the stamp duty value on the date of registration instead of the consideration fixed under the earlier agreement.
Analysis: The transaction was supported by an earlier agreement and the record indicated that the consideration had been fixed prior to registration, with payment having been made in accordance with that arrangement. In these circumstances, the proviso governing adoption of stamp duty value with reference to the agreement date, where the prescribed conditions are satisfied, was held applicable. The Revenue authorities were not justified in disregarding the earlier agreement and substituting the registration-date stamp duty value as the purchase consideration.
Conclusion: The addition under section 56(2)(x)(b)(B) was not sustainable and was deleted in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an earlier agreement fixing consideration is supported by payment in accordance with the statutory conditions, stamp duty value must be examined with reference to the agreement date and not the registration date.