Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Where an immovable property purchase was supported by an earlier agreement, earlier possession and cheque payments made before registration, the relevant consideration was treated as that prior arrangement rather than the later registered deed. On that basis, adopting the stamp duty value as on the registration date for an addition under section 56(2)(x)(b)(B) was unjustified because the record showed the transaction had been agreed and partly performed earlier. The addition was deleted.
Where an immovable property purchase was supported by an earlier agreement, earlier possession and cheque payments made before registration, the relevant consideration was treated as that prior arrangement rather than the later registered deed. On that basis, adopting the stamp duty value as on the registration date for an addition under section 56(2)(x)(b)(B) was unjustified because the record showed the transaction had been agreed and partly performed earlier. The addition was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
