Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Time-share accommodation classification excludes Club or Association Service where purchasers receive contractual occupancy rights without genuine mem...
CENVAT credit for trading requires reversal, while taxable-service rental credit remains proportionately available and limitation issues await resolut...
Vicarious liability for dishonoured company cheques may extend to non-signatory directors where complaints contain foundational responsibility avermen...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
321 to 340 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Withholding tax on payments to non-residents arises only where the sum is chargeable to tax in India. The note states that commission and allied payments were made outside India to non-resident recipients for services rendered outside India, with no permanent establishment or business connection in India. The view that commission became taxable merely because the order was executed in India was rejected, and there was no material to treat the payments as fees for technical services. As no income accrued or arose in India, tax deduction at source was not required and disallowance for non-deduction was not warranted; the deletion of the disallowance was upheld.
Withholding tax on payments to non-residents arises only where the sum is chargeable to tax in India. The note states that commission and allied payments were made outside India to non-resident recipients for services rendered outside India, with no permanent establishment or business connection in India. The view that commission became taxable merely because the order was executed in India was rejected, and there was no material to treat the payments as fees for technical services. As no income accrued or arose in India, tax deduction at source was not required and disallowance for non-deduction was not warranted; the deletion of the disallowance was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.