Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether disallowance under section 40(a)(i) for payments made to non-resident entities could be sustained when the payments were for services rendered outside India and the sums were not chargeable to tax in India, so that no obligation to deduct tax at source arose under section 195.
Analysis: The payments were made to entities situated outside India for services rendered abroad. The recipients had no permanent establishment or business connection in India, and the record showed that the income was earned outside India and did not accrue or arise in India within the meaning of section 9. Section 195 applies only to sums chargeable under the Act; therefore, where the remittance is not chargeable to tax in India, the payer is under no obligation to deduct tax at source. On these facts, the disallowance under section 40(a)(i) could not be justified.
Conclusion: The disallowance under section 40(a)(i) was rightly deleted and the payments were held not to attract deduction of tax at source under section 195.