Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Failure to place the Letter of Undertaking and SEZ Certificate before the adjudicating authority led the HC to set aside the assessment orders and remit the matter for fresh adjudication. The Court noted that the petitioner's zero-rated supply and SEZ-based claim could not be finally examined without those documents, and it granted one further opportunity to file an additional reply and produce them. The Court expressly declined to decide the merits, including the claim under the IGST framework, leaving all substantive issues open for reconsideration.
Failure to place the Letter of Undertaking and SEZ Certificate before the adjudicating authority led the HC to set aside the assessment orders and remit the matter for fresh adjudication. The Court noted that the petitioner's zero-rated supply and SEZ-based claim could not be finally examined without those documents, and it granted one further opportunity to file an additional reply and produce them. The Court expressly declined to decide the merits, including the claim under the IGST framework, leaving all substantive issues open for reconsideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.