Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment orders passed under the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 required interference where the petitioner, an SEZ unit, claimed the benefit of zero-rated supply under the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the orders were stated to have been passed for want of the Letter of Undertaking and SEZ certificate.
Analysis: The petitioner relied on the statutory scheme applicable to SEZ units, including the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, the Special Economic Zones Rules, 2006, Section 7(5)(b) and Section 16 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and the notifications governing reverse charge. The respondent's case was that the petitioner had not produced the Letter of Undertaking and SEZ certificate before the adjudicating authority for verification. The record showed that the impugned orders were passed primarily on that basis, and the SEZ certificate was produced before the Court, with an assurance that the Letter of Undertaking would also be produced.
Outcome: The assessment orders were set aside and the matters were remanded for fresh consideration after the petitioner was given an opportunity to file the additional reply and produce the relevant documents before the adjudicating authority.