Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Failure to place the Letter of Undertaking and SEZ Certificate before the adjudicating authority led the HC to set aside the assessment orders and remit the matter for fresh adjudication. The Court noted that the petitioner's zero-rated supply and SEZ-based claim could not be finally examined without those documents, and it granted one further opportunity to file an additional reply and produce them. The Court expressly declined to decide the merits, including the claim under the IGST framework, leaving all substantive issues open for reconsideration.
Failure to place the Letter of Undertaking and SEZ Certificate before the adjudicating authority led the HC to set aside the assessment orders and remit the matter for fresh adjudication. The Court noted that the petitioner's zero-rated supply and SEZ-based claim could not be finally examined without those documents, and it granted one further opportunity to file an additional reply and produce them. The Court expressly declined to decide the merits, including the claim under the IGST framework, leaving all substantive issues open for reconsideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.