Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Continuing offence of money-laundering: discharge set aside and proceedings reinstated where laundering continued after inclusion of predicate offence...
Explanation 4 to section 11 prevents loan-funded expenditure from being treated as application of income when the borrowing is deployed, but permits the repayment to qualify in the year of repayment if that amount was not already allowed. On the record, the charitable trust had excluded borrowed sums from application in the years of borrowing and claimed application only on repayment, and the Revenue did not rebut the supporting accounts, returns or statements. As no earlier double claim was shown, the repayment was treated as valid application of income and the disallowance was deleted.
Explanation 4 to section 11 prevents loan-funded expenditure from being treated as application of income when the borrowing is deployed, but permits the repayment to qualify in the year of repayment if that amount was not already allowed. On the record, the charitable trust had excluded borrowed sums from application in the years of borrowing and claimed application only on repayment, and the Revenue did not rebut the supporting accounts, returns or statements. As no earlier double claim was shown, the repayment was treated as valid application of income and the disallowance was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
