Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether repayment of loans taken by a charitable trust could be allowed as application of income when the borrowed amounts had not been claimed as application in the year of borrowing, and whether the impugned disallowance resulted in double deduction.
Analysis: Explanation 4 to section 11, as applied by the Tribunal, permits repayment of borrowed funds to be treated as application of income where the corresponding loan-funded expenditure was not earlier claimed as application. The assessee produced computations, returns, annual accounts and statements showing that in the years of borrowing it reduced the loan-funded expenditure from application of income and claimed application only on repayment. The record supported that the repayment claims were made only when the loans were repaid and not when the loans were received. The presumption of prior double claim was not supported by the material on record.
Conclusion: The assessee's repayment of the bank loans was held to be allowable as application of income, and the disallowance was directed to be deleted.