Concessional Basic Customs Duty on Ethernet switches: classification as enterprise switches upheld, challenge dismissed for lack of substantial law qu...
Insolvency petition based on admitted debt and default upheld; challenge for malicious initiation rejected, settlement may proceed under resolution fr...
Quashing of FIR and challenge to ECIR over alleged diversion of funds and preferential ESOP pricing dismissed after prima facie money-laundering findi...
Explanation 4 to section 11 prevents loan-funded expenditure from being treated as application of income when the borrowing is deployed, but permits the repayment to qualify in the year of repayment if that amount was not already allowed. On the record, the charitable trust had excluded borrowed sums from application in the years of borrowing and claimed application only on repayment, and the Revenue did not rebut the supporting accounts, returns or statements. As no earlier double claim was shown, the repayment was treated as valid application of income and the disallowance was deleted.
Explanation 4 to section 11 prevents loan-funded expenditure from being treated as application of income when the borrowing is deployed, but permits the repayment to qualify in the year of repayment if that amount was not already allowed. On the record, the charitable trust had excluded borrowed sums from application in the years of borrowing and claimed application only on repayment, and the Revenue did not rebut the supporting accounts, returns or statements. As no earlier double claim was shown, the repayment was treated as valid application of income and the disallowance was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
