Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Explanation 4 to section 11 prevents loan-funded expenditure from being treated as application of income when the borrowing is deployed, but permits the repayment to qualify in the year of repayment if that amount was not already allowed. On the record, the charitable trust had excluded borrowed sums from application in the years of borrowing and claimed application only on repayment, and the Revenue did not rebut the supporting accounts, returns or statements. As no earlier double claim was shown, the repayment was treated as valid application of income and the disallowance was deleted.
Explanation 4 to section 11 prevents loan-funded expenditure from being treated as application of income when the borrowing is deployed, but permits the repayment to qualify in the year of repayment if that amount was not already allowed. On the record, the charitable trust had excluded borrowed sums from application in the years of borrowing and claimed application only on repayment, and the Revenue did not rebut the supporting accounts, returns or statements. As no earlier double claim was shown, the repayment was treated as valid application of income and the disallowance was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
