Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Corporate guarantee taxability under GST was remitted for fresh assessment because the assessing authority had not properly considered the petitioner's reliance on applicable GST circulars, the contention that only 1% of turnover was taxable, and the earlier Madras HC ruling cited in support. The Court held that these aspects required examination and that the assessment could not stand on the corporate guarantee issue alone. The impugned order was therefore set aside only to that limited extent, with directions for fresh orders after hearing the petitioner and considering supporting material; all other findings were left undisturbed.
Corporate guarantee taxability under GST was remitted for fresh assessment because the assessing authority had not properly considered the petitioner's reliance on applicable GST circulars, the contention that only 1% of turnover was taxable, and the earlier Madras HC ruling cited in support. The Court held that these aspects required examination and that the assessment could not stand on the corporate guarantee issue alone. The impugned order was therefore set aside only to that limited extent, with directions for fresh orders after hearing the petitioner and considering supporting material; all other findings were left undisturbed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.