Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order warranted interference insofar as it treated the corporate guarantee transaction as taxable on the entire turnover, and whether the matter required remand for fresh consideration on the assessee's objection that only 1% of the turnover was liable to tax.
Analysis: The impugned order was an assessment under Section 73 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The Court found that the major part of the tax demand arose from the corporate guarantee issue, and the assessee's contention that only 1% of the turnover could be taxed was not seriously disputed. The assessee also relied on GST circulars and an earlier decision of the Court supporting its stand. In these circumstances, the Court considered it appropriate to set aside the assessment order to the extent it dealt with the corporate guarantee issue and to remit that issue for fresh consideration after giving the assessee an opportunity to file a reply and additional documents.
Conclusion: The assessment order was interfered with only on the corporate guarantee issue, and the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication on that issue alone, while the remaining findings were left undisturbed.