Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Transfer pricing comparability for logistic support services...
Transfer pricing comparability: one support-services company accepted, government-owned and facility-management comparables excluded, forex loss claim remanded.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Transfer pricing comparability for logistic support services turned on functional similarity: Cyber Media Research Ltd. was accepted as a comparable because it provided market research and management consultancy support services, subject to the related party transaction filter, while Apitco Ltd. was excluded as a government-owned company and BVG India Ltd. was excluded for functional dissimilarity arising from facility management, housekeeping and waste-management activities without a separate low-end services segment. The Tribunal upheld these comparability findings and rejected the Revenue's challenge. The assessee's claim that reversal of forex loss had been taxed twice was not finally decided on the existing record and was remanded to the jurisdictional Assessing Officer for fresh factual verification after hearing the assessee.
Transfer pricing comparability for logistic support services turned on functional similarity: Cyber Media Research Ltd. was accepted as a comparable because it provided market research and management consultancy support services, subject to the related party transaction filter, while Apitco Ltd. was excluded as a government-owned company and BVG India Ltd. was excluded for functional dissimilarity arising from facility management, housekeeping and waste-management activities without a separate low-end services segment. The Tribunal upheld these comparability findings and rejected the Revenue's challenge. The assessee's claim that reversal of forex loss had been taxed twice was not finally decided on the existing record and was remanded to the jurisdictional Assessing Officer for fresh factual verification after hearing the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
