Transfer pricing comparables turn on functional similarity and segmental data, with forex-loss duplication requiring fresh factual verification.

Transfer pricing comparability must be based on functional similarity and reliable segmental data: Cyber Media Research Limited was retained as a comparable for a support-services provider, while Apitco Limited and BVG India Limited were excluded because government ownership, divergent service profiles and absence of suitable segmental data undermined comparability. The claim that reversal of forex loss had been taxed twice was not finally accepted on the available record and was restored for fresh factual verification after examination of the books, computations and supporting material. The discussion also notes that factual claims affecting taxable income require verification before relief is granted.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the claim that reversal of forex loss was offered to tax twice required factual verification and remand. (ii) Whether the comparables Apitco Limited, BVG India Limited and Cyber Media Research Limited were correctly excluded or included while determining the arm's length price under transfer pricing provisions.

Issue (i): Whether the claim that reversal of forex loss was offered to tax twice required factual verification and remand.

Analysis: The assessee asserted that an amount relating to reversal of forex loss had been included twice in the computation for the relevant year, but the claim depended on reconciliation of audited financial statements and computations for two assessment years. Since the factual basis had not been conclusively verified by the lower authorities, the matter required examination of the books, computations, and supporting material.

Conclusion: The issue was restored to the jurisdictional Assessing Officer for fresh verification and decision in accordance with law, after granting reasonable opportunity to the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the comparables Apitco Limited, BVG India Limited and Cyber Media Research Limited were correctly excluded or included while determining the arm's length price under transfer pricing provisions.

Analysis: Cyber Media Research Limited was accepted as functionally comparable to a support-services provider, and its inclusion was sustained subject to the related party transaction filter. Apitco Limited was excluded because government ownership was treated as a relevant factor in comparability, and the company was also found not to match the assessee's service profile. BVG India Limited was excluded because its activities in facility management, housekeeping and waste management were found functionally different from routine support services and lacking appropriate segmental data.

Conclusion: The inclusion of Cyber Media Research Limited was upheld, and the exclusion of Apitco Limited and BVG India Limited was affirmed.

Final Conclusion: The assessee obtained statistical relief on the forex-loss issue and succeeded on the transfer-pricing comparables, while the Revenue's challenges were rejected and the cross-objection became infructuous.

Ratio Decidendi: Comparable selection in transfer pricing must rest on functional similarity and reliable segmental data, and government-owned entities may be excluded where ownership and business profile materially affect comparability; factual claims affecting taxable income require verification before relief is granted.

---