Anti-profiteering proceedings may extend beyond the original complaint where the DGAP report warrants reconsideration, and Rule 133(4) supports further inquiry into wider products; the objection to jurisdiction was rejected. Omission of the rules constituting the former authority did not extinguish pending proceedings or prior orders, since the statutory anti-profiteering scheme continued through successor forums. The prescribed decision timeline was held directory, so delay did not bar the matter. The supplier was found to have failed to pass on a GST rate reduction by commensurate price reduction, and benefit had to reach each recipient. Interest and penalty were not imposed for the pre-amendment period because those provisions were introduced later.
Anti-profiteering proceedings may extend beyond the original complaint where the DGAP report warrants reconsideration, and Rule 133(4) supports further inquiry into wider products; the objection to jurisdiction was rejected. Omission of the rules constituting the former authority did not extinguish pending proceedings or prior orders, since the statutory anti-profiteering scheme continued through successor forums. The prescribed decision timeline was held directory, so delay did not bar the matter. The supplier was found to have failed to pass on a GST rate reduction by commensurate price reduction, and benefit had to reach each recipient. Interest and penalty were not imposed for the pre-amendment period because those provisions were introduced later.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
