https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100579 Anti-profiteering proceedings may extend beyond the original complaint where the DGAP report warrants reconsideration, and Rule 133(4) supports further inquiry into wider products; the objection to jurisdiction was rejected. Omission of the rules constituting the former authority did not extinguish pending proceedings or prior orders, since the statutory anti-profiteering scheme continued through successor forums. The prescribed decision timeline was held directory, so delay did not bar the matter. The supplier was found to have failed to pass on a GST rate reduction by commensurate price reduction, and benefit had to reach each recipient. Interest and penalty were not imposed for the pre-amendment period because those provisions were introduced later. en-us Mon, 08 Jun 2026 08:52:43 +0530 Mon, 08 Jun 2026 08:52:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100579 Anti-profiteering proceedings may extend beyond the original complaint where the DGAP report warrants reconsideration, and Rule 133(4) supports further inquiry into wider products; the objection to jurisdiction was rejected. Omission of the rules constituting the former authority did not extinguish pending proceedings or prior orders, since the statutory anti-profiteering scheme continued through successor forums. The prescribed decision timeline was held directory, so delay did not bar the matter. The supplier was found to have failed to pass on a GST rate reduction by commensurate price reduction, and benefit had to reach each recipient. Interest and penalty were not imposed for the pre-amendment period because those provisions were introduced later. Highlights GST Mon, 08 Jun 2026 08:52:43 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100579