Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
GST registration cancelled for non-filing of returns may be restored where the registered person furnishes all pending returns and pays the tax dues with applicable interest, penalty and late fee, because the proper officer can consider dropping proceedings under the proviso to Rule 22(4). The text notes that the High Court treated the matter as covered by an earlier coordinate Bench decision and allowed the assessee to approach the authority for restoration in accordance with law. It also records a direction that the limitation period for assessment proceedings would run from the date of the order, except for FY 2024-25, which would be governed separately.
GST registration cancelled for non-filing of returns may be restored where the registered person furnishes all pending returns and pays the tax dues with applicable interest, penalty and late fee, because the proper officer can consider dropping proceedings under the proviso to Rule 22(4). The text notes that the High Court treated the matter as covered by an earlier coordinate Bench decision and allowed the assessee to approach the authority for restoration in accordance with law. It also records a direction that the limitation period for assessment proceedings would run from the date of the order, except for FY 2024-25, which would be governed separately.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.