Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to restoration of GST registration after cancellation for non-filing of returns, subject to furnishing pending returns and making payment of tax dues, interest and late fee.
Analysis: The cancellation was founded on non-filing of returns for six months. The Court relied on the proviso to Rule 22(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, under which proceedings may be dropped if the person, instead of merely replying to the notice, furnishes all pending returns and makes full payment of the tax dues with applicable interest and late fee. The Court treated the earlier coordinate bench decision as covering the same factual and legal position and noted that cancellation of registration carries serious civil consequences. It therefore directed the petitioner to approach the concerned authority within 60 days and comply with the stipulated statutory requirements.
Conclusion: The petitioner was granted a conditional opportunity to seek restoration of GST registration, and the authority was directed to consider restoration in accordance with law upon compliance with the required returns and payments.