Mark-to-Market losses on principal-protected debentures are deductible as business expenditure when the obligation is crystallized under mercantile ac...
Deferred Payment of Customs Duty extended to Eligible Manufacturer Importers with electronic registration and ICEGATE authentication for conditional c...
Tariff classification determines GST schedule and rate; beverages in Schedule III attract the higher rate, tea extracts and syrups in Schedule I attra...
Fraudulent trading requires cogent evidence of intent to defraud; ordinary-course payments protected, except post-insolvency withdrawals must be resto...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5821 to 5840 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition under section 56(2)(viib) on CCPS premium was deleted where the shares were issued under a reorganisation to the parent and existing shareholders, the valuation was supported by registered valuers or a merchant banker under Rule 11UA, and the transaction was not shown to be unaccounted money. The Tribunal also held that conversion of earlier CCPS into equity during the year did not attract section 56(2)(viib) for that assessment year. A year-end management fee reversal was remanded for fresh verification because the explanation lacked supporting evidence. Payments to MTH for transformation and related hotel services were held revenue in nature, and section 40A(2) was found inapplicable.
Addition under section 56(2)(viib) on CCPS premium was deleted where the shares were issued under a reorganisation to the parent and existing shareholders, the valuation was supported by registered valuers or a merchant banker under Rule 11UA, and the transaction was not shown to be unaccounted money. The Tribunal also held that conversion of earlier CCPS into equity during the year did not attract section 56(2)(viib) for that assessment year. A year-end management fee reversal was remanded for fresh verification because the explanation lacked supporting evidence. Payments to MTH for transformation and related hotel services were held revenue in nature, and section 40A(2) was found inapplicable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.