<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Section 56(2)(viib) CCPS premium addition deleted where scheme-based valuation and compliant funding showed no unaccounted money.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100534</link>
    <description>Addition under section 56(2)(viib) on CCPS premium was deleted where the shares were issued under a reorganisation to the parent and existing shareholders, the valuation was supported by registered valuers or a merchant banker under Rule 11UA, and the transaction was not shown to be unaccounted money. The Tribunal also held that conversion of earlier CCPS into equity during the year did not attract section 56(2)(viib) for that assessment year. A year-end management fee reversal was remanded for fresh verification because the explanation lacked supporting evidence. Payments to MTH for transformation and related hotel services were held revenue in nature, and section 40A(2) was found inapplicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 08:42:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 08:42:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=905735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Section 56(2)(viib) CCPS premium addition deleted where scheme-based valuation and compliant funding showed no unaccounted money.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100534</link>
      <description>Addition under section 56(2)(viib) on CCPS premium was deleted where the shares were issued under a reorganisation to the parent and existing shareholders, the valuation was supported by registered valuers or a merchant banker under Rule 11UA, and the transaction was not shown to be unaccounted money. The Tribunal also held that conversion of earlier CCPS into equity during the year did not attract section 56(2)(viib) for that assessment year. A year-end management fee reversal was remanded for fresh verification because the explanation lacked supporting evidence. Payments to MTH for transformation and related hotel services were held revenue in nature, and section 40A(2) was found inapplicable.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 08:42:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>