Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition under section 56(2)(viib) on CCPS premium was deleted where the shares were issued under a reorganisation to the parent and existing shareholders, the valuation was supported by registered valuers or a merchant banker under Rule 11UA, and the transaction was not shown to be unaccounted money. The Tribunal also held that conversion of earlier CCPS into equity during the year did not attract section 56(2)(viib) for that assessment year. A year-end management fee reversal was remanded for fresh verification because the explanation lacked supporting evidence. Payments to MTH for transformation and related hotel services were held revenue in nature, and section 40A(2) was found inapplicable.
Addition under section 56(2)(viib) on CCPS premium was deleted where the shares were issued under a reorganisation to the parent and existing shareholders, the valuation was supported by registered valuers or a merchant banker under Rule 11UA, and the transaction was not shown to be unaccounted money. The Tribunal also held that conversion of earlier CCPS into equity during the year did not attract section 56(2)(viib) for that assessment year. A year-end management fee reversal was remanded for fresh verification because the explanation lacked supporting evidence. Payments to MTH for transformation and related hotel services were held revenue in nature, and section 40A(2) was found inapplicable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.