Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The Tribunal held that the extended reassessment period beyond three years was unavailable because the alleged escaped income related only to a claimed donation deduction and did not meet the statutory monetary threshold for extension. It further found that, even after excluding the time allowed to respond to the section 148A(b) notice, the Assessing Officer had time only until 07/04/2023 to issue the reassessment notice, but it was issued on 10/04/2023. The sixth proviso was therefore inapplicable, and the reassessment notice was time-barred and invalid; the merits of the disallowance were left open.
The Tribunal held that the extended reassessment period beyond three years was unavailable because the alleged escaped income related only to a claimed donation deduction and did not meet the statutory monetary threshold for extension. It further found that, even after excluding the time allowed to respond to the section 148A(b) notice, the Assessing Officer had time only until 07/04/2023 to issue the reassessment notice, but it was issued on 10/04/2023. The sixth proviso was therefore inapplicable, and the reassessment notice was time-barred and invalid; the merits of the disallowance were left open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
