Misdeclaration of quantity rejected where supplier evidence established counting errors, so reassessment, confiscation and redemption fine were set as...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6221 to 6240 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Tribunal held that the extended reassessment period beyond three years was unavailable because the alleged escaped income related only to a claimed donation deduction and did not meet the statutory monetary threshold for extension. It further found that, even after excluding the time allowed to respond to the section 148A(b) notice, the Assessing Officer had time only until 07/04/2023 to issue the reassessment notice, but it was issued on 10/04/2023. The sixth proviso was therefore inapplicable, and the reassessment notice was time-barred and invalid; the merits of the disallowance were left open.
The Tribunal held that the extended reassessment period beyond three years was unavailable because the alleged escaped income related only to a claimed donation deduction and did not meet the statutory monetary threshold for extension. It further found that, even after excluding the time allowed to respond to the section 148A(b) notice, the Assessing Officer had time only until 07/04/2023 to issue the reassessment notice, but it was issued on 10/04/2023. The sixth proviso was therefore inapplicable, and the reassessment notice was time-barred and invalid; the merits of the disallowance were left open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
