Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
The Tribunal held that the extended reassessment period beyond three years was unavailable because the alleged escaped income related only to a claimed donation deduction and did not meet the statutory monetary threshold for extension. It further found that, even after excluding the time allowed to respond to the section 148A(b) notice, the Assessing Officer had time only until 07/04/2023 to issue the reassessment notice, but it was issued on 10/04/2023. The sixth proviso was therefore inapplicable, and the reassessment notice was time-barred and invalid; the merits of the disallowance were left open.
The Tribunal held that the extended reassessment period beyond three years was unavailable because the alleged escaped income related only to a claimed donation deduction and did not meet the statutory monetary threshold for extension. It further found that, even after excluding the time allowed to respond to the section 148A(b) notice, the Assessing Officer had time only until 07/04/2023 to issue the reassessment notice, but it was issued on 10/04/2023. The sixth proviso was therefore inapplicable, and the reassessment notice was time-barred and invalid; the merits of the disallowance were left open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
