Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Imported parts of diesel engines and earth-moving equipment were found to fall under Customs Tariff Heading 8483, but the dispute centred on the applicable IGST entry. The Tribunal held that Notification No. 35/2017-IT(RT) specifically inserted plain shaft bearings at Sl. No. 369A in Schedule III, attracting IGST at 18%, and simultaneously omitted "plain shaft bearings" from Sl. No. 135 in Schedule IV. Because the goods matched the specific Schedule III entry, the later amendment under Notification No. 43/2017 did not apply. The lower IGST rate was therefore correctly allowed, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Imported parts of diesel engines and earth-moving equipment were found to fall under Customs Tariff Heading 8483, but the dispute centred on the applicable IGST entry. The Tribunal held that Notification No. 35/2017-IT(RT) specifically inserted plain shaft bearings at Sl. No. 369A in Schedule III, attracting IGST at 18%, and simultaneously omitted "plain shaft bearings" from Sl. No. 135 in Schedule IV. Because the goods matched the specific Schedule III entry, the later amendment under Notification No. 43/2017 did not apply. The lower IGST rate was therefore correctly allowed, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.