Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported parts of diesel engines and earth moving equipment, classified under CTH 8483, were liable to IGST at 28% under Schedule IV of Notification No. 01/2017-IT(RT) dated 28.06.2017 or at 18% under Schedule III after insertion of Sl. No. 369A by Notification No. 35/2017-IT(RT) dated 13.10.2017.
Analysis: The imported goods were admittedly classified under CTH 8483. Notification No. 35/2017-IT(RT) inserted Sl. No. 369A in Schedule III for plain shaft bearings under CTH 8483 and omitted the words "plain shaft bearings" from Sl. No. 135 in Schedule IV. The later amendment by Notification No. 43/2017-IT(RT) did not displace the applicability of Sl. No. 369A to the imported goods. The claim of the Revenue that the goods continued to fall under Schedule IV was rejected, and the benefit of the lower rate was held to be available to the importer.
Conclusion: The goods were correctly entitled to IGST at 18% under Sl. No. 369A of Schedule III, and not at 28% under Schedule IV.