Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3981 to 4000 of 96136 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A genuine donation made by cheque to an approved institution remained substantively eligible for deduction, and the claim could not be refused merely because the wrong deduction provision was quoted. The Tribunal held that a technical misdescription of the provision did not defeat relief where the facts already on record established eligibility and allowing the claim under the correct provision caused no adverse effect on total income. It also recognised that appellate authority could grant the proper relief on the existing material, so the disallowance was unsustainable and was directed to be deleted.
A genuine donation made by cheque to an approved institution remained substantively eligible for deduction, and the claim could not be refused merely because the wrong deduction provision was quoted. The Tribunal held that a technical misdescription of the provision did not defeat relief where the facts already on record established eligibility and allowing the claim under the correct provision caused no adverse effect on total income. It also recognised that appellate authority could grant the proper relief on the existing material, so the disallowance was unsustainable and was directed to be deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
