Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the disallowance of the donation-related deduction claimed under section 80GGC/80GGA could be sustained when the payment was made through banking channels to an approved institution eligible under section 35(1)(ii), and whether the claim could be denied merely because it was made under an incorrect provision.
Analysis: The donation of Rs. 1,60,000/- was made by cheque to an approved institution notified under section 35(1)(ii), and the genuineness of the payment was not in dispute. The claim, though made under section 80GGC/80GGA, was substantively eligible under section 35(1), and a mere mistaken classification of the claim could not defeat the underlying statutory benefit. The record also showed that the denial was sustained on technical grounds despite the absence of any adverse impact on the total income.
Conclusion: The disallowance was held to be unsustainable and was deleted, granting relief to the assessee.