Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Rebate under section 87A was held available for Assessment Year 2024-25 to a resident individual opting for the new tax regime, even where total income included short-term capital gains taxed under section 111A. The Tribunal followed a co-ordinate Bench view on identical facts and accepted that, for that year, there was no express statutory bar in section 87A or section 111A denying rebate if the prescribed income threshold was satisfied. The later amendment was treated as prospective, so it did not apply to the year in question. Accordingly, the processing adjustment denying the rebate was deleted and the rebate claim was allowed.
Rebate under section 87A was held available for Assessment Year 2024-25 to a resident individual opting for the new tax regime, even where total income included short-term capital gains taxed under section 111A. The Tribunal followed a co-ordinate Bench view on identical facts and accepted that, for that year, there was no express statutory bar in section 87A or section 111A denying rebate if the prescribed income threshold was satisfied. The later amendment was treated as prospective, so it did not apply to the year in question. Accordingly, the processing adjustment denying the rebate was deleted and the rebate claim was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.