Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a resident individual assessed under section 115BAC(1A) and having total income not exceeding Rs. 7,00,000 is entitled to rebate under section 87A against tax payable on short-term capital gains taxable under section 111A for Assessment Year 2024-25.
Analysis: The rebate provision in section 87A, as applicable for Assessment Year 2024-25, contains no express exclusion for income chargeable under section 111A. The statutory scheme does not distinguish between normal income and special-rate income for denying rebate where the total income threshold is satisfied. The reliance placed on the subject-to clause in section 115BAC(1A) and on subsequent proposed amendment was held insufficient to curtail the plain language of the unamended provision applicable to the year in question. The denial of rebate on a system-driven basis was found to be unsupported by statute.
Conclusion: The assessee was held entitled to rebate under section 87A even though the income included short-term capital gains taxable under section 111A, and the disallowance of rebate was set aside.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the tax demand arising from denial of rebate was deleted.
Ratio Decidendi: In the absence of an express statutory bar, rebate under section 87A cannot be denied to a resident individual satisfying the income threshold merely because part of the income is taxed at a special rate under section 111A while the assessee is assessed under section 115BAC(1A).