Tariff classification determines GST schedule and rate; beverages in Schedule III attract the higher rate, tea extracts and syrups in Schedule I attra...
Fraudulent trading requires cogent evidence of intent to defraud; ordinary-course payments protected, except post-insolvency withdrawals must be resto...
Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Delayed filing of the annual return in GSTR-9 attracted a specific late fee under the GST enactments, but the Court applied its earlier ruling to hold that general penalty under Section 125 could not be imposed for the same default. It further held that the late fee could not be demanded beyond the permissible limit recognised in that precedent, and the demand in excess of the limit under the CGST and SGST enactments was unsustainable. The impugned order was therefore set aside to that extent, while the petitioner was directed to pay the admitted tax liability within the time granted.
Delayed filing of the annual return in GSTR-9 attracted a specific late fee under the GST enactments, but the Court applied its earlier ruling to hold that general penalty under Section 125 could not be imposed for the same default. It further held that the late fee could not be demanded beyond the permissible limit recognised in that precedent, and the demand in excess of the limit under the CGST and SGST enactments was unsustainable. The impugned order was therefore set aside to that extent, while the petitioner was directed to pay the admitted tax liability within the time granted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
