Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned demand imposing late fee in excess of Rs. 10,000 and general penalty under the GST enactments could be sustained in view of the earlier binding decision, and what consequential relief was warranted.
Analysis: The impugned order was tested against the earlier decision extending the benefit of the amnesty notifications and holding that, for returns filed within the relevant window, late fee cannot exceed the capped amount and general penalty under Section 125 of the GST enactments cannot be imposed when a late fee consequence already follows. The order also recognized the further directions ordinarily issued in such matters, including payment of admitted tax liability and continuation of coercive proceedings only in accordance with law.
Conclusion: The impugned order could not be sustained to the extent it levied late fee beyond the permissible cap and imposed general penalty, and it was set aside. The petitioner was required to pay the admitted tax liability within the time granted, and the attachment and proceedings were directed to remain in abeyance in the manner ordered.