Jurisdictional validity: notice issued by a non jurisdictional officer invalidates reassessment where no formal transfer or independent verification o...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5961 to 5980 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
For AY 2009-10, the pre-amendment position on reference to a Valuation Officer governed the computation of capital gains. Where the assessee adopted the fair market value of the property as on 01.04.1981 on the basis of a registered valuer's report, the Assessing Officer had no authority to make a reference merely to reduce that value. On that footing, the Valuation Officer's report was held irrelevant for recomputing long-term capital gains, and the resulting addition was deleted. The alternate contention on tolerance in sale consideration was not examined because the primary issue was ative.
For AY 2009-10, the pre-amendment position on reference to a Valuation Officer governed the computation of capital gains. Where the assessee adopted the fair market value of the property as on 01.04.1981 on the basis of a registered valuer's report, the Assessing Officer had no authority to make a reference merely to reduce that value. On that footing, the Valuation Officer's report was held irrelevant for recomputing long-term capital gains, and the resulting addition was deleted. The alternate contention on tolerance in sale consideration was not examined because the primary issue was ative.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.